pgebet baccarat game obeys the law of large numbers

Blackjack and Baccarat are both random games, and the results of random games are only subject to the law of large numbers. Random phenomena (such as the results of gambling games) cannot be predicted, nor can they be changed using technology (gambling skills) (what is “random” and what is the “law of large numbers” has been introduced in an earlier article in this column and will not be repeated) . Casinos set gambling rules based on the law of large numbers, so that during the gambling process, the casino’s winning rate is slightly higher than that of gamblers, so that the casino wins on average and the gamblers lose on average.

In a period (for example, before the 1990s), blackjack card counters were able to win on average by taking advantage of the weaknesses in the card rules, some loopholes in the process of shuffling and selling cards, and waiting for a favorable opportunity to make a vigorous attack. . The so-called favorable opportunity means that the card counter waits until there is a significant deviation between the number of high cards and small cards, that is, the number of high cards is more than the number of small cards by a certain standard (this standard is customized by the card counter), and then the card counter reports to the dealer. Launch an attack. But overall, the nature of the law of large numbers has not changed, but the number of trials is not enough (because the number of remaining cards is limited, and the probability distribution of big and small cards has been accurately calculated by the card counter) to show its power. However, since the 1990s, casinos in countries or regions with developed gambling industries have improved blackjack card rules, plugging loopholes in the processes of shuffling, burning, and cutting cards, and card counters have been unable to use their skills. That’s it. The myth that card counters can win evenly disappears.

Abandon effective tools and fall into nonsense

When card counters are still unable to win on average in the highly technical blackjack game, the so-called “Baccarat King” and “Baccarat Card Counter Expert” have written books claiming that with their calculations Card technology helps gamblers make fortunes. I think this is either a fallacy or nonsense. Yes, high-level “fallacies and nonsense” require knowledge of packaging and nonsense. However, pgebet believes that a certain “Baccarat King” and “Baccarat Card Counting Expert” only have packaging and lack the knowledge to speak nonsense. Readers with a slightly higher IQ will spot the fallacy of the “Baccarat card counting expert” at a glance.

To count cards, pgebet believes that you must have considerable knowledge of mathematics (mainly probability). But the “Baccarat Card Counting Expert” didn’t even understand the basic and key concepts in probability statistics, so he talked nonsense.